Strategies for responding to NSF proposal reviews
Receiving a proposal rejection is dispiriting, but the reality is that most proposals are rejected, and every successful scientist has received numerous rejection notices. Carefully interpreting proposal reviews and responding to them effectively can drastically increase the likelihood of future funding success!
This workshop will include an introduction to the merit review process at the National Science Foundation, a “field guide” to the documents that accompany an NSF decision letter, and strategies to help you analyze your proposal reviews and plan for resubmission. Attendees will apply these strategies to their own reviews and should leave the workshop ready to revise their proposals with confidence.
Learn about the whole fall series here https://hsistemhub.org/2022-grantsmanship-workshops-sprsum/
Goals of the Workshop
- Learn how proposals are reviewed at NSF.
- Learn about the types of documents that NSF provides to PIs when merit review is complete, and how to “read between the lines” of these documents.
- Practice strategies for identifying the most important points to address in a revised proposal and the corollary: determining what to ignore.
- Participants should leave this workshop with a thorough understanding of how to interpret proposal review documents and a plan for revising their own proposals for resubmission.
Enrollment is free and is limited to 12 participants per workshop. Workshop size is limited to allow sufficient time for review analysis activities and personal interaction.
Priority is given to current HSI faculty and staff who are revising previously declined proposals for resubmission to any NSF program. Admission priority is given to faculty within the first 10 years of their first academic tenure-track appointment. Applicants should be aware that the selection process strives for diverse geographical and institutional representation. The selection decision is final and summary reviews are not provided.
Submit your application at this link:
Upon completion of this workshop, attendees will understand how:
- NSF’s merit review process works.
- To interpret proposal reviews, panel summaries, and context statements.
- To distinguish substantive points from outliers in reviewer comments.
- To communicate with NSF staff to gain additional insight into the review of their proposal.
- To effectively address reviewer critiques in proposal revisions.
Attendees should bring the documents received from NSF in relation to the declination of a proposal that they would like to revise. Typically, these documents include a panel context statement, panel summary, and individual proposal reviews (proposal types that are reviewed internally such as RAPID and EAGER will not have these documents). Review documents can be downloaded from FastLane and/or Research.gov by following the instructions in the decision email from NSF.
Please watch these two videos produced by NSF about merit review and the panel process:
Merit review (6:12):
Panel review process (14:31):
Karen Mabry earned her Ph.D. in Animal Behavior from the University of California, Davis. Her research program at NMSU focuses on the behavior and ecology of animals in environments that vary across space and time; much of this work has been supported by NSF awards. From 2017-2020, she was a Program Officer in the Directorate for Biological Sciences at the National Science Foundation, where she managed the merit review process for the Animal Behavior Program and interacted with researchers concerning all aspects of proposal submission and review.
Workshop Sponsors and External Links
September 17, 2021
- Dr. Catherine Swift – Grant Coordinator, University of Houston – Victoria
- Celia Jenkins – Director of Grants Management, Cochise College
- Eric Bubar – Associate Professor of Physics, Marymount University
- John Montgomery – Assistant VP for Research and Graduate Dean, Eastern New Mexico University
- Monica Trujillo – Associate Professor of Biology, Queensborough Community College
- Taffeta Elliott – Assistant Professor, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology
- Ruby Riley – PK-12 Initiatives Manager, Hispanic Association of Colleges and Universities
November 5, 2021
- Faiza Peetz – Adjunct Assistant Professor, CUNY/ College of Staten Island
- Aryzbe Najera – Post Doctoral, University of Texas at El Paso
- Victor Burgos – Chief Learning Officer, AMBE Academy, Inc. 501 (c)(3)
- Irma Torres-Catanach, Ph.D. – Post Doctoral Researcher, University of Texas at El Paso
- Waleska Sanabria Leon – Chair Social Science and History Department, Pontifical Catholic University of Puerto Rico
- Hui Cai – Assistant Professor, University of California – Merced
- Ji Kim – Assistant Professor, Guttman Community College – CUNY